Preprint
18 June 2021
Chua, Kao Ping, Conti, Rena M, Becker, Nora V
View resource
Introduction: Millions of U.S. patients have been hospitalized for COVID-19. After discharge, these patients often have extensive health care needs, but out-of-pocket burden for this care is poorly described. We assessed out-of-pocket spending within 90 days of discharge from COVID-19 hospitalization among privately insured and Medicare Advantage patients.
Methods: In May 2021, we conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the IQVIA PharMetrics ® Plus for Academics Database, a national de-identified claims database. Among privately insured and Medicare Advantage patients hospitalized for COVID-19 between March-June 2020, we calculated mean out-of-pocket spending for care within 90 days of discharge. For context, we repeated analyses for patients hospitalized for pneumonia.
Results: Among 1,465 COVID-19 patients included, 516 (35.2%) and 949 (64.8%) were covered by private...
News (peer reviewed)
17 June 2021
Tsai Y, et al
View resource
The COVID-19 pandemic substantially increased medical care requirements and associated costs in the older fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare beneficiary population in the USA, according to a study published in Annals of Internal Medicine.
Editorial
6 June 2021
Feinman, Jared
View resource
THE SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has impacted our healthcare system in myriad ways, many of which are brutally obvious to anyone with even a cursory knowledge of current events (overrun intensive care units, ventilator and personal protective equipment shortages, and nearly 500,000 deaths in the United States as of the writing of this editorial). There are, however, more subtle effects that the pandemic has wrought on both the health of Americans and the healthcare system that are no less insidious despite the lack of above-the-fold headlines. Prominent among these are the sequelae of prolonged social isolation, fear of COVID-19 infection, and postponed routine and semiurgent medical care (either due to efforts by medical professionals to conserve limited hospital beds and other resources or patients avoiding care in order to minimize their risk of...
Journal Article
4 June 2021
Broughel, James, Kotrous, Michael
View resource
This paper estimates the benefits and costs of state suppression policies to “bend the curve” during the initial outbreak of COVID-19 in the United States. We employ an approach that values benefits and costs in terms of additions or subtractions to total production. Relative to a baseline in which only the infected and at-risk populations mitigate the spread of coronavirus, we estimate that total benefits of suppression policies to economic output are between $632.5 billion and $765.0 billion from early March 2020 to August 1, 2020. Relative to private mitigation, output lost due to suppression policies is estimated to be between $214.2 billion and $331.5 billion. The cost estimate is based on the duration of nonessential business closures and stay-at-home orders, which were enforced between 42 and 65 days. Our results indicate that the net benefits of suppression policies to...
Journal Article
3 June 2021
Wong, Michelle S,Haderlein, Taona P,Yuan, Anita H,Moy, Ernest,Jones, Kenneth T,Washington, Donna L
View resource
Studies documenting coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) racial/ethnic disparities in the United States were limited to data from the initial few months of the pandemic, did not account for changes over time, and focused primarily on Black and Hispanic minority groups. To fill these gaps, we examined time trends in racial/ethnic disparities in COVID-19 infection and mortality. We used the Veteran Health Administration’s (VHA) national database of veteran COVID-19 infections over three time periods: 3/1/2020-5/31/2020 (spring); 6/1/2020-8/31/2020 (summer); and 9/1/2020-11/25/2020 (fall). We calculated COVID-19 infection and mortality predicted probabilities from logistic regression models that included time period-by-race/ethnicity interaction terms, and controlled for age, gender, and prior diagnosis of CDC risk factors. Racial/ethnic groups at higher risk for COVID-19 infection...
Preprint
13 May 2021
Nash, Beatrice,Badea, Anthony,Reddy, Ankita,Bosch, Miguel,Salcedo, Nol,Gomez, Adam R,Versiani, Alice,Silva, Gislaine Celestino Dutra,Santos, Thayza Maria Izabel Lopes Dos,Milhim, Bruno H G A,Moraes, Marilia M,Campos, Guilherme Rodrigues Fernandes,Quieroz, Flavia,Reis, Andreia Francesli Negri,Nogueira, Mauricio L,Naumova, Elena N,Bosch, Irene,Herrera, Bobby Brooke
View resource
High frequency screening of populations has been proposed as a strategy in facilitating control of the COVID-19 pandemic. We use computational modeling, coupled with clinical data from rapid antigen tests, to predict the impact of frequent viral antigen rapid testing on COVID-19 spread and outcomes. Using patient nasal or nasopharyngeal swab specimens, we demonstrate that the sensitivity/specificity of two rapid antigen tests compared to quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) are 82.0%/100% and 84.7%/85.7%, respectively; moreover, sensitivity correlates directly with viral load. Based on COVID-19 data from three regions in the United States and São José do Rio Preto, Brazil, we show that high frequency, strategic population-wide rapid testing, even at varied accuracy levels, diminishes COVID-19 infections, hospitalizations, and deaths at a fraction of the...
Journal Article
11 May 2021
Ferranna, Maddalena, Cadarette, Daniel, Bloom, David E
View resource
Given the scarcity of safe and effective COVID-19 vaccines, a chief policy question is how to allocate them among different sociodemographic groups. This paper evaluates COVID-19 vaccine prioritization strategies proposed to date, focusing on their stated goals; the mechanisms through which the selected allocations affect the course and burden of the pandemic; and the main epidemiological, economic, logistical, and political issues that arise when setting the prioritization strategy. The paper uses a simple, age-stratified susceptible-exposed-infectious-recovered model to quantitatively assess the performance of alternative prioritization strategies with respect to avoided deaths, avoided infections, and life-years gained. We demonstrate that prioritizing essential workers is a viable strategy for reducing the number of cases and years of life lost, while the largest reduction in...
Preprint
3 May 2021
Chow, Ronald, Prsic, Elizabeth Horn, Shin, Hyun Joon
View resource
ABSTRACT
Introduction
A recent systematic review and meta-analysis by our group reported on thirteen published cohorts investigating 110,078 patients. Patients administered statins after their COVID-19 diagnosis and hospitalization were found to have a lower risk of mortality. Given this reported superiority, a logical next question would be whether statins are cost-effective treatment options for hospitalized COVID-19 patients. In this paper, we report on a cost-effectiveness analysis of statin-containing treatment regimens for hospitalized COVID-19 patients, from a United States healthcare perspective.
Methods
A Markov model was used, to compare statin use and no statin use among hospitalized COVID-19 patients. The cycle length was one week, with a time horizon of 4 weeks. A Monte Carlo microsimulation, with 20,000 samples were used. All analyses were conducted using TreeAge...
Journal Article
27 April 2021
Loertscher, Simon, Muir, Ellen V
View resource
Without widespread immunization, the road to recovery from the current COVID-19 lockdowns will optimally follow a path that finds the difficult balance between the social and economic benefits of liberty and the toll from the disease. We provide an approach that combines epidemiology and economic models, taking as given that the maximum capacity of the healthcare system imposes a constraint that must not be exceeded. Treating the transmission rate as a decreasing function of the severity of the lockdown, we first determine the minimal lockdown that satisfies this constraint using an epidemiology model with a homogeneous population to predict future demand for healthcare. Allowing for a heterogeneous population, we then derive the optimal lockdown policy under the assumption of homogeneous mixing and show that it is characterized by a bang-bang solution. Possibilities such as the...
Journal Article
27 April 2021
Wasil, Akash R, Taylor, Madison E, Franzen, Rose E, Steinberg, Joshua S, DeRubeis, Robert J
View resource
IntroductionIn addition to the serious physical health consequences of COVID-19, the resulting societal changes have had major impacts on population-wide mental health (Liu et al., 2020). COVID-19 has introduced a variety of stressors into modern life, including fears about contracting the virus, concern for loved ones, economic instability, social distancing, and other major lifestyle disruptions (Pfefferbaum and North, 2020). Many of these concerns have affected graduate and professional students (i.e., students earning advanced degrees, as well as non-traditional and non-degree seeking students). Even before the crisis, students were vulnerable to depression, anxiety, loneliness, and suicidal ideation (Evans et al., 2018). The COVID-19 crisis has exacerbated these concerns: many universities have ceased non-essential operations, mandated that students leave campus, and shut...